Is Enterprise 2.0 Relevant only to “Doers”?

March 11th, 2008
by Jeremy Thomas

Enterprise 2.0 is about helping knowledge workers foster productive collaboration, innovation, and create a more connected culture. Knowledge workers keep each other informed through blog posts, author wiki pages together, and share bookmarks for interesting information resources. Together they generate folksonomies - user perspectives on corporate information assets, and bypass IT-sanctioned applications in favor of more helpful tools.

But do all of these activities concern Management - you know, the people who organize the “doers”? Management spends most of its time in meetings reporting progress and being appraised of new initiatives. Does Management really have time to make sense of all of the blog posts, wiki pages and social bookmarks in their Enterprise 2.0 Solution? I’m not sure they do.

Management is more concerned with milestones and KPIs. Milestones track the development of new product features and release dates. They track progress. Progress is achieved through the effort of knowledge workers who may or may not be using Enterprise 2.0 tools to do their work.

details.gifAnd Management’s management is concerned with KPIs (key performance indicators). KPIs track progress at a macro-level and let business strategist understand how well their strategies are being implemented.

Managers need to make sense of the organized chaos that is Enterprise 2.0. From a traceability perspective, knowing which blog posts and wiki pages helped contribute to the development of “feature X” would help Management give recognition to those who authored those assets. It would also help Management track the ROI on their Enterprise 2.0 investment. Semantic Web search engines offer perhaps the greatest technical hope for providing this automated capability. Imagine a world where information assets were annotated with metadata that helped computer programs derive the same meaning from them as humans do through natural language. Each asset about “project Z” could be annotated as such helping a semantic computer program automatically aggregate information about said project.

But I digress.

I’m not convinced that Enterprise 2.0 is a platform through which Management will track milestones and KPIs. Managers don’t operate in the “Detail” layer. Instead, they’ll depend on their teams, which do operate in the detail layer and do leverage Enterprise 2.0, to help them make sense of progress.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • BlinkList
  • digg
  • Reddit

4 Responses to “Is Enterprise 2.0 Relevant only to “Doers”?”

  1. Jevon Says:

    I think there is an entire art and science in E20 that we haven’t been talking much about: Synthesis.

    I am just writing a blog post on what I think are the three components that make up a management-ready social computing framework. Creation, Curation and Synthesis.

    At some point you kind of realize that we aren’t all that far along with this are we? ;-)

  2. Joe Says:

    The problem is that the people needed to foot the bills and sign off on the policies are not E2.0 users and often view these tools as “play” or “distraction.”

  3. Jeremy Thomas Says:

    Jevon I like it and I think you’re right, we aren’t as far along. We aren’t looking at this from a holistic perspective. We’re missing the discussion about tools that make sense of the chaos (curation?) and match them to organizational goals (synthesis?).

    One technology which is somewhat relevant to this discussion is “Many Eyes”, which Sam Lawrence of Jive Software uses to make sense of key note addresses and blog posts (http://gobigalways.com/past-and-future-two-conference-faces-of-microsoft-same-week/).

    Looking forward to your post.

    @Joe I agree that this is a barrier to Enterprise 2.0 adoption. We need to demonstrate to management that E2.0 is about productivity.

  4. Gordon Taylor Says:

    Hey Jerermy!
    You make an excellent point.

    I started writing here, but ended up finishing my comment over here:
    http://www.infovark.com/2008/03/17/doing-the-do/

    Gordon :)

Leave a Reply